Native phosphate-solubilizing bacteria from Al-Qadisiyah soils: screening, identification and effect on sunflower phosphorus nutrition in a calcareous soilq
Abstract
Phosphorus (P) applied to the calcareous soils of central Iraq is quickly bound as calcium phosphates, so crops recover little of it. We screened phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) native to six calcareous soils of Al-Qadisiyah and tested the most active ones on sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Twelve isolates were compared on National Botanical Research Institute’s phosphate (NBRIP) agar and in NBRIP broth with tricalcium phosphate (TCP), and grouped by phenotype. Three isolates were then inoculated into an unsterilized calcareous soil (Olsen P 5.6 mg kg−1) given 0, 15 or 30 mg P kg−1, in a factorial pot trial with four blocks harvested 60 days after emergence. Net soluble P ranged from 59.7 to 332.0 mg L−1 (6.0–33.2% of TCP-P) and rose as broth pH fell (r = −0.98). The plate solubilization index explained only 56% of the variation in broth P and ranked the isolates differently. Six isolates were Bacillus-like, four Pseudomonas-like and two unresolved Gram-negative rods. Inoculation increased total P uptake by 23.0% across P rates (p< 0.001), with no significant inoculant × P interaction. Relative gains were largest without added P (21–43%) and smallest at 30 mg P kg−1 (12–20%). The Pseudomonas-like isolate QPSB07 also raised shoot P concentration and residual Olsen P, and its uptake at 15 mg P kg−1 matched about 24.7 mg P kg−1 of fertilizer alone. Broth-based selection of native PSB is worth pursuing for sunflower on calcareous soils, but molecular identification and field trials are still needed.
References
2. Zou T, et al. Global trends of cropland phosphorus use and sustainability challenges. Nature. 2022;611(7934):81–87. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05220-z
3. Adnan M, et al. Sustainable phosphorus management in calcareous soils: problems and prospects. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 2025;48(13):2179–2200. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2025.2477269
4. Abbas M, et al. Assessment of soil quality index along hydrosequence in grain crops growing areas of Najaf and Diwaniya governorates of Iraq. Plant Archives. 2021;21(Suppl. 1):898–908. https://doi.org/10.51470/plantarchives.2021.v21.s1.145
5. Al-Shihmani LS, et al. Physicochemical and mineral properties of suspended sediments of the Tigris and Euphrates rivers in the Mesopotamian Plain. Science of the Total Environment. 2024;912:170066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170066
6. Ahmed A, et al. Synergistic effects of phosphatic fertilizers and cow manure on wheat yield and phosphorus use efficiency in calcareous soils. Diyala Agricultural Sciences Journal. 2026;18(1):12–24. https://doi.org/10.52951/dasj.26180102
7. Pang F, et al. Soil phosphorus transformation and plant uptake driven by phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2024;15:1383813. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1383813
8. Pan L, Cai B. Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria: advances in their physiology, molecular mechanisms and microbial community effects. Microorganisms. 2023;11(12):2904. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11122904
9. Timofeeva A, et al. Prospects for using phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms as natural fertilizers in agriculture. Plants. 2022;11(16):2119. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11162119
10. Elhaissoufi W, et al. Phosphate bacterial solubilization: a key rhizosphere driving force enabling higher P use efficiency and crop productivity. Journal of Advanced Research. 2022;38:13–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2021.08.014
11. O’Callaghan M, et al. Soil microbial inoculants for sustainable agriculture: limitations and opportunities. Soil Use and Management. 2022;38(1):64–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12811
12. Jiang M, et al. Home-based microbial solution to boost crop growth in low-fertility soil. New Phytologist. 2023;239(2):752–765. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18943
13. Xie J, et al. A bacterium isolated from soil in a karst rocky desertification region has efficient phosphate-solubilizing and plant growth-promoting ability. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2021;11:625450. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.625450
14. García-Berumen JA, et al. Phosphate rock solubilization by Burkholderia and Paraburkholderia strains: implications for biofertilizer development in sustainable agriculture. International Journal of Agronomy. 2025;2025:7341082. https://doi.org/10.1155/ioa/7341082
15. Hassan N, et al. Impact of phosphate solubilizing bacteria in combination with di-ammonium phosphate on growth and development of sunflower (Helianthus annus L.). Journal of Plant Nutrition. 2021;44(16):2359–2370. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2021.1918158
16. Jahil HM, et al. Effect of bacterial inoculation, Bacillus megaterium, vermicompost, and phosphate pock on growth and yield of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2021;735:012087. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/735/1/012087
17. Umar MI. P-solubilizing microorganisms performance on manure and rock phosphate and their influences on soil and plant phosphorous in calcareous soils. Iraqi Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2021;52(2):437–447. https://doi.org/10.36103/ijas.v52i2.1305
18. Janati W, et al. Isolation and characterization of phosphate solubilizing bacteria naturally colonizing legumes rhizosphere in Morocco. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2022;13:958300. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.958300
19. Janati W, et al. Phosphate solubilizing bacteria from soils with varying environmental conditions: occurrence and function. PLOS ONE. 2023;18(12):e0289127. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289127
20. Yu X, et al. Global analysis of phosphorus fertilizer use efficiency in cereal crops. Global Food Security. 2021;29:100545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100545
21. Tabbasum S, et al. Spatial heterogeneity of soil phosphorus influencing bacterial functional adaptations in alkaline calcareous soils. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2026;16:1720323. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1720323
22. Chen X, et al. An Enterobacter cloacae strain NG-33 that can solubilize phosphate and promote maize growth. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2022;13:1047313. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.1047313
23. Ateş Ö. Phosphate solubilizing bacteria isolation medium: rock phosphate or tricalcium phosphate? Geomicrobiology Journal. 2023;40(8):714–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490451.2023.2245401
24. Kouas S, et al. Halotolerant phosphate solubilizing bacteria isolated from arid area in Tunisia improve P status and photosynthetic activity of cultivated barley under P shortage. Heliyon. 2024;10:e38653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38653
25. Luo B, et al. Decoupling the effects of organic acid and EPS in phosphorus activation by phosphate solubilizing bacteria: from screening to morphological transformation analysis. Environmental Technology & Innovation. 2025;37:104389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2025.104389
26. Liang Y, et al. Isolation of inorganic phosphorus-solubilizing bacteria from the rhizosphere of Festuca arundinacea Schreb. Geomicrobiology Journal. 2023;40(6):572–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490451.2023.2208096
27. Gehlot P, et al. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of phosphate-solubilizing ability of Lysinibacillus macroides: a climate-resilient biofertilizer candidate for sustainable crop nutrition. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2026;17:1849362. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2026.1849362
28. Sultan SH, et al. Effect of biological inoculation (Bacillus megatrium, Pseudomonas fluorescence) to increase phosphorus availability and growth standards plant (barbin) Portulaca oleracea L. Basrah Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2025;38(Special issue):114–128. https://doi.org/10.37077/25200860.2025.38.sp.14
29. García-Sánchez M, et al. Improved rock phosphate dissolution from organic acids is driven by nitrate assimilation of bacteria isolated from nitrate and CaCO3-rich soil. PLOS ONE. 2023;18:e0283437. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283437
30. Iqbal Z, et al. Phosphate-solubilizing Bacillus sp. modulate soil exoenzyme activities and improve wheat growth. Microbial Ecology. 2024;87:15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-023-02340-5
31. Alahmed S, et al. Diversity and functional traits of indigenous microbiome in Hilla agricultural soils: implications for biocontrol and bioremediation. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2026;42:89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-026-05204-5
32. Okorie B. Considerations for microbial inoculation under dryland stress conditions. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 2026;62:511–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-026-02010-x
33. Santos J, et al. Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria from different genera, host plants, and climates: influence of soil pH on plant growth and biochemistry. Land. 2025;14(10):2065. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14102065
34. Zhou G, et al. Effects of organic carbon, inorganic phosphorus, and phosphorus-solubilizing bacteria on maize growth, nutrient uptake, and rhizosphere phosphorus availability. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2025;16:1644448. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1644448
35. Anzuay MS, et al. Phosphorus uptake, plant growth promotion, and yield enhancement in maize (Zea mays L.) and peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) by native phosphate-solubilizing bacteria. Agronomy. 2026;16(12):1144. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy16121144
36. Abbaszadeh-Dahaji P, et al. Mitigation of copper stress in maize (Zea mays) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus) plants by copper-resistant Pseudomonas strains. Current Microbiology. 2021;78(4):1335–1343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-021-02408-w
37. Chandana M, et al. Effect of the growth and yield attributes of sunflower and chickpea with response to different doses and methods of phosphorus solubilizing bacteria in combination with different phosphorus levels. Journal of Oilseeds Research. 2023;40(2):218–225. https://doi.org/10.56739/esp4wf61
38. Beltran-Medina I, et al. Inoculation of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria improves soil phosphorus mobilization and maize productivity. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems. 2023;125(2):261–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-023-10268-y

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright © Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.

.