1 Department of Pharmaceutical analysis, M.L.College of Pharmacy, S. Konda-523101.
2 Head, Department of Pharmaceutical analysis, M.L.College of Pharmacy, S. Konda-523101.
3 Principal, M.L.College of Pharmacy, S.Konda-523101.
Abstract
A simple, Accurate, precise method was developed for the simultaneous estimation of the Darunavir and Ritonavir in Tablet dosage form. The chromatogram was run through Agilent C18 150 x 4.6 mm, 5m. Mobile phase containing Buffer 0.1% Formic acid: Acetonitrile, taken in the ratio 70:30 was pumped through the column at a flow rate of 0.95 ml/min. The temperature was maintained at 30°C. The optimized wavelength selected was 293 nm. The retention times of Darunavir and Ritonavir were found to be 2.369min and 2.911. %RSD of the Darunavir and Ritonavir were and found to be 0.7 and 0.5 respectively. %Recovery was obtained as 99.67% and 99.78% for Darunavir and Ritonavir respectively. LOD, LOQ values obtained from regression equations of Darunavir and Ritonavir were 1.49, 5.191and 0.37, 1.11 respectively. Regression equation of Darunavir is y = 5421x + 640.7, and y = 3870.x + 5191 of Ritonavir. Retention times were decreased and run time was decreased, so the method developed was simple and economical that can be adopted in regular Quality control tests in Industries.
Keywords: Darunavir, Ritonavir,RP-HPLC.
Article History
Received on: 03-03-2021
Revised on: 1-04-2021
Accepted on: 25-04-2021
*Corresponding Author
Pemra Raju
Email: mlcollegeofpharmacy@gmail.com
Doi: https://doi.org/10.46956/ijihd.vi.157
Production and Hosted By
Saap.org.in
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Copyright © 2021 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article.
Introduction
Pharmaceutical products formulated with more than one drug, typically referred to as combination products. These combination products can present daunting challenges to the analytical chemist responsible for the development and validation of analytical methods. The development and validation of analytical methods Spectrophotometric, High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and High-performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) for drug products containing more than one active ingredient. The official test methods that result from these processes are used by quality control laboratories to ensure the identity, purity, potency, and performance of drug products. The number of drugs introduced into the market is increasing every year. These drugs may be either new entities or partial structural modification of the existing ones. Very often there is a time lag from the date of introduction of a drug into the market to the date of its inclusion in pharmacopoeias. This happens because of the possible uncertainties in the continuous and wider usage of these drugs, reports of new toxicities (resulting in their withdrawal from the market), development of patient resistance and introduction of better drugs by competitors. Under these conditions, standards and analytical procedures for these drugs may not be available in the pharmacopoeias. It becomes necessary, therefore to develop newer analytical methods for such drugs3 Darunavir [1] (DRV) is chemically (3R,3aS,6aR)- hexahydrofuro[2,3-b]furan-3-yl N-[(2S,3R)- 3-hydroxy-4-[N-(2-methylpropyl)4- aminobenzenesulfonamido]-1-phenylbutan2yl] carbamate Figure 1. It is a protease inhibitor used to treat HIV. It acts on the HIV aspartyl protease which the virus needs to cleave the HIV polyprotein into its functional fragments.
Figure 1: chemical structure of Darunavir
Ritonavir [2] (RTV) is chemically 1,3-thiazol-5-ylmethyl N- [(2S,3S,5S)-3-hydroxy-5-[(2S)-3-methyl-2-{[methyl({[2-(propan-2-yl)-1,3-thiazol-4- yl]methyl}) carbamoyl] amino} butanamido] 1,6-diphenylhexan-2-yl]carbamate Figure 2. It is an HIV protease inhibitor that interferes with the reproductive cycle of HIV.
Figure 2: chemical structure of Ritonavir
Although it was initially developed as an independent antiviral agent, it has been shown to possess advantageous properties in combination regimens with low-dose ritonavir and other protease inhibitors.3-7 There are few methods reported in the literature of Darunavir and Ritonavir alone or in combination with other drugs in the pure and pharmaceutical formulation by UV, HPLC and UPLC-MS 8-20. In view of the need of suitable, cost effective RP HPLC method for routine analysis of simultaneous estimation of RTV and DRV in bulk and synthetic mixture (tablet dosage form), attempts we made do develop a simple, accurate, precise and cost effective analytical method for the estimation of RTV and DRV. The purpose of stability testing is to check the drug quality under the action of many environmental factors like temperature, acid, base and oxidative condition. This is necessary for establishment of re-test period for the drug products and for recommendation conditions for their storage. ICH guidelines therefore emphasize stability-indicating analytical methods4 . Efforts were therefore made to develop a novel, fast and validated stability indicating HPLC procedure for determining simultaneously both the drugs in tablet dosage forms The proposed method will be validated as per ICH guidelines.
Experimental work
Materials and Methods
Materials
Ritonavir and Darunavir pure drugs (API), Combination Ritonavir and Darunavir, Distilled water, Acetonitrile, Phosphate buffer, , Methanol, Potassium dihydrogen ortho phosphate buffer, Ortho-phosphoric acid. Allthe above chemicals and solvents are from Rankem
Instruments
Electronics Balance-Denver , pH meter -BVK enterprises, India ,Ultrasonicator-BVK enterprises, WATERS HPLC 2695 SYSTEM equipped with quaternary pumps,Photo Diode Array detector and Auto sampler integrated with Empower 2 Software.UV-VIS spectrophotometer PG Instruments T60 with special bandwidth of 2mm and 10mm and matched quartz cells integrated with UV win 6 Software was used for measuring absorbances of Ritonavir and Darunavir solutions.
Methods
Diluent
Based up on the solubility of the drugs, diluent was selected, Methanol and Water taken in the ratio of 50:50
Preparation of Standard stock solutions
Accurately weighed 12.5 mg of Ritonavir, 100mg of Darunavir and transferred to 25ml volumetric flask and 3/4 th of diluents was added to these flask and sonicated for 10 minutes. Flask were made up with diluents and labeled as Standard stock solution. (500µg/ml of Ritonavir and 4000µg/ml of Darunavir)
Preparation of Standard working solutions (100% solution)
1ml from each stock solution was pipetted out and taken into a 10ml volumetric flask and made up with diluent. (50µg/ml Ritonavir of and 400µg/ml of Darunavir)
Preparation of Sample stock solutions
5 tablets were weighed and the average weight of each tablet was calculated, then the weight equivalent to tablet was transferred into a 100 ml volumetric flask, 5ml of diluents was added and sonicated for 25 min, further the volume was made up with diluent and filtered by HPLC filters (500µg/ml of Ritonavir and 4000µg/ml of Darunavir)
Preparation of Sample working solutions (100% solution)
1ml of filtered sample stock solution was transferred to 10ml volumetric flask and made up with diluent.(50µg/ml of Ritonavir and 400µg/ml of Darunavir)
Preparation of buffer
0.1%OPA Buffer
1ml of ortho phosphoric acid was diluted to 1000ml with HPLC grade water.
Method Validation [21-22]
System suitability parameter
The system suitability parameters were determined by preparing standard solutions of Ritonavir (50ppm) and Darunavir (400ppm) and the solutions were injected six times and the parameters like peak tailing, resolution and USP plate count were determined. The % RSD for the area of six standard injections results should not be more than 2%.
Specificity
Checking of the interference in the optimized method.We should not find interfering peaks in blank and placebo at retention times of these drugs in this method. So this method was said to be specific.
Precision
Preparation of Standard stock solutions Accurately weighed 12.5 mg of Ritonavir, 100mg of Darunavir and transferred to 25ml volumetric flask and 3/4 th of diluents was added to these flask and sonicated for 10 minutes. Flask were made up with diluents and labeled as Standard stock solution. (500µg/ml of Ritonavir and 4000µg/ml of Daruna)
Preparation of Standard working solutions (100% solution) 1ml from each stock solution was pipetted out and taken into a 10ml volumetric flask and made up with diluent. (50µg/ml of Ritonavir and 400µg/ml of Darunavir)
Preparation of Sample stock solutions 5 tablets were weighed and the average weight of each tablet was calculated, then the weight equivalent to tablet was transferred into a 10 ml volumetric flask, 5ml of diluents was added and sonicated for 25 min, further the volume was made up with diluent and filtered by HPLC filters (500µg/ml of Ritonavir and 4000µg/ml of Darunavir)
Preparation of Sample working solutions (100% solution) 1ml of filtered sample stock solution was transferred to 10ml volumetric flask and made up with diluent.(50µg/ml of Ritonavir and 400µg/ml of Darunavir)
Linearity
Preparation of Standard stock solutions Accurately weighed 12.5 mg of Ritonavir, 100mg of Darunavir and transferred to 25ml volumetric flask. and 3/4 th of diluents was added to these flask and sonicated for 10 minutes. Flask were made up with diluents and labeled as Standard stock solution. (500µg/ml of Ritonavir and 4000µg/ml of Daruna)
25% Standard solution 0.25ml each from two standard stock solutions was pipetted out and made up to 10ml. (12.5µg/ml of Ritonavir and 100µg/ml of Darunavir)
50% Standard solution 0.5ml each from two standard stock solutions was pipetted out and made up to 10ml. (25µg/ml of Ritonavir and 200µg/ml of Darunavir)
75% Standard solution 0.75ml each from two standard stock solutions was pipetted out and made up to 10ml. (37.5µg/ml of Ritonavir and 300µg/ml of Darunavir)
100% Standard solution 1.0ml each from two standard stock solutions was pipetted out and made up to 10ml. (50µg/ml of Ritonavir and 400µg/ml of Darunavir)
125% Standard solution 1.25ml each from two standard stock solutions was pipetted out and made up to 10ml. (62.5µg/ml of Ritonavir and 500µg/ml of Darunavir)
150% Standard solution 1.5ml each from two standard stock solutions was pipettede out and made up to 10ml (75µg/ml of Ritonavir and 600µg/ml of Darunavir)
Accuracy
Preparation of Standard stock solutions Accurately weighed 12.5 mg of Ritonavir, 100mg of Darunavir and transferred to 25ml volumetric flask. and 3/4 th of diluents was added to these flask and sonicated for 10 minutes. Flask were made up with diluents and labeled as Standard stock solution. (500µg/ml of Ritonavir and 4000µg/ml of Darunavir)
Preparation of 50% Spiked Solution 0.5ml of sample stock solution was taken into a 10ml volumetric flask, to that 1.0ml from each standard stock solution was pipetted out, and made up to the mark with diluent.
Preparation of 100% Spiked Solution 1.0ml of sample stock solution was taken into a 10ml volumetric flask, to that 1.0ml from each standard stock solution was pipetted out, and made up to the mark with diluent.
Preparation of 150% Spiked Solution
1.5ml of sample stock solution was taken into a 10ml volumetric flask, to that 1.0ml from each standard stock solution was pipetted out, and made up to the mark with diluent.
Acceptance Criteria
The % Recovery for each level should be between 98.0 to 102
Robustness Small deliberatechanges in method like Flow rate, mobile phase ratio, and temperature are made but there were no recognized change in the result and are within range as per ICH Guide lines.
Robustness conditions like Flow minus (1ml/min), Flow plus (1.2ml/min), mobile phase minus, mobile phase plus, temperature minus (25°C) and temperature plus(35°C) was maintained and samples were injected in duplicate manner. System suitability parameters were not much effected and all the parameters were passed. %RSD was within the limit.
LOD sample Preparation 0.25ml each from two standard stock solutions was pipetted out and transferred to two separate 10ml volumetric flasks and made up with diluents. From the above solutions 0.1ml each of Ritonavir, Darunavir, solutions respectively were transferred to 10ml volumetric flasks and made up with the same diluents
LOQ sample Preparation 0.25ml each from two standard stock solutions was pipetted out and transferred to two separate 10ml volumetric flask and made up with diluent. From the above solutions 0.3ml each of Ritonavir, Darunavir, solutions respectively were transferred to 10ml volumetric flasks and made up with the same diluent.
Degradation studies [23]
Oxidation
To 1 ml of stock solution of Ritonavir and Darunavir, 1 ml of 20% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was added separately. The solutions were kept for 30 min at 600c. For HPLC study, the resultant solution was diluted to obtain 50 µg/ml & 400 µg/ml solution and 10 µl were injected into the system and the chromatograms were recorded to assess the stability of sample.
Acid Degradation Studies
To 1 ml of stock ssolution Ritonavir and Darunavir, 1ml of 2N Hydrochloricacidwasadded and refluxed for 30mins at 600c.The resultant solution was diluted to obtain 50 µg/ml & 400 µg/ml solution and10µl solutions were injected into the system and the chromatograms were recorded to assess the stability of sample.
AlkaliDegradationStudies:
To 1 ml of stock solutionRitonavir and Darunavir, 1 ml of 2N sodium hydroxidewasadded and refluxed for 30mins at 600c. Theresultantsolutionwas diluted to obtain 50µg/ml&400µg/ml solution and 10µl were injected into the system and the chromatograms were recordedtoassessthestabilityofsample.
Dry Heat Degradation Studies
Thestandarddrug solution was placedinovenat105°C for1h tostudydryheat degradation.ForHPLCstudy,the resultant solution was diluted to 50µg/ml&400µg/ml solution and10µl were injected into the system and the chromatogramswererecordedtoassessthestability ofthesample.
Photo Stability studies
The photochemical stability of the drug was also studied by exposing the 500µg/ml &4000µg/ml solution to UV Light by keeping the beaker in UV Chamber for 1days or 200 Watt hours/m2 in photo stability chamber. For HPLC study, the resultant solution was diluted to obtain 200µg/ml&300µg/ml solutions and 10µl were injected into the system and the chromatograms were recordedtoassessthestabilityofsample.
.
NeutralDegradationStudies
Stress testing under neutral conditions was studied by refluxingthedruginwaterfor1hrs atatemperature of 60º. For HPLC study, the resultant solution was diluted to 50µg/ml&400µg/ml solution and 10µl were injected intothesystemandthechromatogramswererecorded toassessthestabilityofthesample.
Results and Discussion
Optimized method
Chromatographic conditions
Mobile phase : 70% Formic acid (0.1%): 30% Acetonitrile
Flow rate : 1ml/min
Column : Azilent C18 (4.6 x 150mm, 5µm)
Detector wave length : 260nm
Column temperature : 30°C
Injection volume : 10mL
Run time : 6 min
Diluent : Water and Acetonitrile in the ratio 50:50
Results : Both peaks have good resolution, tailing Factor, theoretical plate count and resolution.
Fig 3 Optimized Chromatogram
System suitability: All the system suitability parameters were within the range and satisfactory as per ICH guidelines
Table:1 Systemsuitability parameters for Darunavir and Ritonavir
|
S no |
Darunavir |
Ritonavir |
|||||
|
Inj |
RT(min) |
USP Plate Count |
Tailing |
RT(min) |
USP Plate Count |
Tailing |
Resolution |
|
1 |
2.404 |
6178 |
1.19 |
2.986 |
6601 |
1.13 |
4.4 |
|
2 |
2.405 |
6198 |
1.16 |
2.986 |
7121 |
1.12 |
4.4 |
|
3 |
2.405 |
6089 |
1.20 |
2.988 |
6573 |
1.15 |
4.3 |
|
4 |
2.413 |
5924 |
1.17 |
2.998 |
6244 |
1.09 |
4.2 |
|
5 |
2.421 |
5892 |
1.18 |
3.013 |
6859 |
1.13 |
4.4 |
|
6 |
2.433 |
6253 |
1.18 |
3.036 |
6763 |
1.10 |
4.5 |
Fig 4 Systemsuitability Chromatogram
Discussion
According to ICH guidelines, plate count should be more than 2000, tailing factor should be less than 2 and resolution must be more than 2. All the system suitable parameters were passed and were within the limits.
Validation
Specificity
Figure No. 5. Chromatogram of blank
Figure No. 6 Chromatogram of placebo
Linearity:
Table 2 Linearity table for Darunavir and Ritonavir.
|
Darunavir |
Ritonavir |
||
|
Conc (μg/mL) |
Peak area |
Conc (μg/mL) |
Peak area |
|
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
100 |
390764 |
12.5 |
67733 |
|
200 |
786093 |
25 |
134305 |
|
300 |
1174300 |
37.5 |
205232 |
|
400 |
1563383 |
50 |
277599 |
|
500 |
1907925 |
62.5 |
338712 |
|
600 |
2341934 |
75 |
404125 |
Fig No. 7 Calibrationcurve of Darunavir
Fig No. 8 CalibrationcurveofRitonavir
Discussion
Six linear concentrations of Darunavir (100-600µg/ml) and Ritonavir (12.5-75µg/ml) were injected in a duplicate manner. Average areas were mentioned above and linearity equations obtained for Darunavir was y = 3870.x + 5191 and of Ritonavir was y = 5421.x + 640.7 Correlation coefficient obtained was 0.999 for the two drugs.
Fig 9 Typical Chromatogram
Discussion
Retention times of Darunavir and Ritonavir were 2.371 min and 2.938 min. respectively. We did not found and interfering peaks in blank and placebo at retention times of these drugs in this method. So this method was said to be specific.
Precision
System Precision
Table 3 System precision table of Darunavir and Ritonavir
|
S. No |
Area of Darunavir |
Area of Ritonavir |
|
1. |
1562412 |
272468 |
|
2. |
1565061 |
277211 |
|
3. |
1568363 |
271649 |
|
4. |
1566157 |
270677 |
|
5. |
1566158 |
273575 |
|
6. |
1561519 |
272713 |
|
Mean |
1564945 |
273049 |
|
S.D |
2560.9 |
2264.3 |
|
%RSD |
0.2 |
0.8 |
Repeatability
Table 4 Repeatability table of Darunavir and Ritonavir
|
S. No |
Area of Darunavir |
Area of Ritonavir |
|
1. |
1563796 |
273031 |
|
2. |
1563323 |
274473 |
|
3. |
1570928 |
275737 |
|
4. |
1585721 |
275393 |
|
5. |
1590713 |
273519 |
|
6. |
1582460 |
272597 |
|
Mean |
1576157 |
274125 |
|
S.D |
11729.6 |
1282.7 |
|
%RSD |
0.7 |
0.5 |
Discussion
Multiple sampling from a sample stock solution was done and six working sample solutions of same concentrations were prepared, each injection from each working sample solution was given and obtained areas were mentioned in the above table. Average area, standard deviation and % RSD were calculated for two drugs and obtained as 0.7% and 0.5% respectively for Darunavir and Ritonavir. As the limit of Precision was less than “2” the system precision was passed in this method.
Intermediate precision (Day_ Day Precision)
Table 5 Intermediate precision table of Darunavir and Ritonavir
|
S. No |
Area of Darunavir |
Area of Ritonavir |
|
1. |
1508957 |
270706 |
|
2. |
1506297 |
270017 |
|
3. |
1488309 |
274639 |
|
4. |
1509602 |
268996 |
|
5. |
1502940 |
267494 |
|
6. |
1499562 |
270510 |
|
Mean |
1502611 |
270394 |
|
S.D |
7958.4 |
2393.2 |
|
%RSD |
0.5 |
0.9 |
Discussion
Multiple sampling from a sample stock solution was done and six working sample solutions of same concentrations were prepared, each injection from each working sample solution was given on the next day of the sample preparation and obtained areas were mentioned in the above table. Average area, standard deviation and % RSD were calculated for two drugs and obtained as 0.5% and 0.9% respectively for Darunavir and Ritonavir. As the limit of Precision was less than “2” the system precision was passed in this method.
Accuracy
Table 6 Accuracy table of Darunavir
|
% Level |
Amount Spiked (μg/mL) |
Amount recovered (μg/mL) |
% Recovery |
Mean %Recovery |
|
50% |
200 |
200.00 |
100.00 |
99.67% |
|
200 |
202.03 |
101.02 |
||
|
200 |
196.43 |
98.22 |
||
|
100% |
400 |
396.33 |
99.08 |
|
|
400 |
398.75 |
99.69 |
||
|
400 |
400.62 |
100.15 |
||
|
150% |
600 |
596.41 |
99.40 |
|
|
600 |
590.94 |
98.49 |
||
|
600 |
605.68 |
100.95 |
Table 7 Accuracy table of Ritonavir
|
% Level |
Amount Spiked (μg/mL) |
Amount recovered (μg/mL) |
% Recovery |
Mean %Recovery |
|
50% |
25 |
24.94 |
99.75 |
99.57% |
|
25 |
24.80 |
99.19 |
||
|
25 |
25.03 |
100.13 |
||
|
100% |
50 |
49.10 |
98.21 |
|
|
50 |
49.30 |
98.60 |
||
|
50 |
49.57 |
99.13 |
||
|
150% |
75 |
74.33 |
99.10 |
|
|
75 |
74.83 |
99.78 |
||
|
75 |
74.68 |
99.57 |
Discussion
Three levels of Accuracy samples were prepared by the standard addition method. Triplicate injections were given for each level of accuracy and mean %Recovery was obtained as 99.67% and 99.57% for Darunavir and Ritonavir respectively.
Sensitivity
Table 8 Sensitivity table of Darunavir and Ritonavir
|
Molecule |
LOD |
LOQ |
|
Darunavir |
1.49 |
4.51 |
|
Ritonavir |
0.37 |
1.11 |
Robustness
Table 9 Robustness data for Darunavir and Ritonavir.
|
S.no |
Condition |
%RSD of Darunavir |
%RSD of Ritonavir |
|
1 |
Flow rate (-) 0.9ml/min |
1.1 |
1.1 |
|
2 |
Flow rate (+) 1.1ml/min |
0.3 |
1.0 |
|
3 |
Mobile phase (-) 65:35A |
0.8 |
1.0 |
|
4 |
Mobile phase (+) 75B:25A |
0.5 |
0.7 |
|
5 |
Temperature (-) 25°C |
0.5 |
0.4 |
|
6 |
Temperature (+) 35°C |
0.8 |
0.7 |
Discussion
Robustness conditions like Flow minus (0.85ml/min), Flow plus (1.15ml/min), mobile phase minus (65B:35A), mobile phase plus (75B:25A), temperature minus (25°C) and temperature plus(35°C)was maintained and samples were injected in duplicate manner. System suitability parameters were not much affected and all the parameters were passed. %RSD was within the limit.
Assay
Mylan pharmaceuticals(Durart R 450 Tablet), bearing the label claim Darunavir 400mg, Ritonavir 50mg. Assay was performed with the above formulation. Average % Assay for Darunavir and Ritonavir obtained was 100.62% and 100.29% respectively
Table 10Assay Data of Darunavir
|
S.no |
Standard Area |
Sample area |
% Assay |
|
1 |
1562412 |
1563796 |
99.83 |
|
2 |
1565061 |
1563323 |
99.80 |
|
3 |
1568363 |
1570928 |
100.28 |
|
4 |
1566157 |
1585721 |
101.23 |
|
5 |
1566158 |
1590713 |
101.54 |
|
6 |
1561519 |
1582460 |
101.02 |
|
Avg |
1564945 |
1576157 |
100.62 |
|
Stdev |
2560.9 |
11729.6 |
0.75 |
|
%RSD |
0.2 |
0.7 |
0.7 |
Table 11 Assay Data of Ritonavir
|
S.no |
Standard Area |
Sample area |
% Assay |
|
1 |
272468 |
273031 |
99.89 |
|
2 |
277211 |
274473 |
100.42 |
|
3 |
271649 |
275737 |
100.88 |
|
4 |
270677 |
275393 |
100.76 |
|
5 |
273575 |
273519 |
100.07 |
|
6 |
272713 |
272597 |
99.73 |
|
Avg |
273049 |
274125 |
100.29 |
|
Stdev |
2264.3 |
1282.7 |
0.5 |
|
%RSD |
0.8 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
Fig 08 Chromatogram of working standard solution
Fig No. 09 Chromatogram of working sample solution
Degradation data
Table 12 Degradation data for Darunavir and Ritonavir
|
Type of degradation |
Darunavir |
Ritonavir |
||||
|
AREA |
%RECOVERED |
% DEGRADED |
AREA |
%RECOVERED |
% DEGRADED |
|
|
Acid |
1420809 |
90.70 |
9.30 |
256076 |
93.69 |
6.31 |
|
Base |
1471589 |
93.94 |
6.06 |
260788 |
95.41 |
4.59 |
|
Peroxide |
1453963 |
92.82 |
7.18 |
257555 |
94.23 |
5.77 |
|
Thermal |
1522949 |
97.22 |
2.78 |
265997 |
97.32 |
2.68 |
|
Uv |
1552374 |
99.10 |
0.90 |
269020 |
98.43 |
1.57 |
|
Water |
1556561 |
99.36 |
0.64 |
270988 |
99.15 |
0.85 |
Conclusion
A simple, Accurate, precise method was developed for the simultaneous estimation of the Darunavir and Ritonavir in Tablet dosage form. Retention time of Darunavir and Ritonavir were found to be 2.369min and 2.911. %RSD of the Darunavir and Ritonavir were and found to be 0.7 and 0.5 respectively. %Recovery was obtained as 99.67% and 99.78% for Darunavir and Ritonavir respectively. LOD, LOQ values obtained from regression equations of Darunavir and Ritonavir were 1.49, 5.191and 0.37, 1.11 respectively. Regression equation of Darunavir isy = 5421x + 640.7, and y = 3870.x + 5191 of Ritonavir. Retention times were decreased and run time was decreased, so the method developed was simple and economical that can be adopted in regular Quality control test in Industries.
Author Contribution
All authors are Contributed Equally.
Funding
No Funding
Conflict of Intrest
Authors are Declared no Conflict of Interest
References